20.11.2014, 12:59
It is right, the LCN-GVS is in this case only the couple-device.
But, if:
- the electrician have experiance with OPC
- the third-party visualisation understand OPC
- the project is a big building with many modules like a office-tower, no family home
- the electrician has no experiance in programming
then it is the better way to use the LCN-GVS. The costs in hard- and software is higher, but they can saved by the programming.
Should it a @home-solution, made as a hobby, or has the customer good experiance in programming many systems, so the LCN-PCHK is probadly the better way.
But, if we dont know the basics in this project, we can't decide, what here the better solution is.
But, if:
- the electrician have experiance with OPC
- the third-party visualisation understand OPC
- the project is a big building with many modules like a office-tower, no family home
- the electrician has no experiance in programming
then it is the better way to use the LCN-GVS. The costs in hard- and software is higher, but they can saved by the programming.
Should it a @home-solution, made as a hobby, or has the customer good experiance in programming many systems, so the LCN-PCHK is probadly the better way.
But, if we dont know the basics in this project, we can't decide, what here the better solution is.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen vom LCN-Team
H.Szlopsna
H.Szlopsna